Translated from 日本語 • View original 
Alerts are inherently important signals for early detection of threats, but too many of them increase the risk of missing important incidents. The mental load and personalization of analysts also become more serious, and as a result, the quality of response to the entire SOC decreases - this is the essence of SOC fatigue.
In this article, we will explain the background of SOC fatigue, the risks of neglect, and the concepts and practical points of security operation design required in the era of excessive alerts.
Background: The Era of Excessive Alerts
The reason behind the apparent SOC fatigue is the rapid change in the security environment.
First, the number of detection targets has increased. Unlike the days when it was mainly on-premise, the scope of monitoring has now expanded significantly, including cloud, SaaS, remote terminals, and IoT. Each generates its own logs and alerts, so the amount of information aggregated in the SOC continues to increase year by year.
Next is the trade-off between detection accuracy and comprehensiveness. Too much for fear of missing out, if you set strict rules, false positives will skyrocket. On the other hand, if you narrow down your alerts too much, you won't be able to detect the signs that really matter. There are many cases where this balance adjustment cannot keep up and falls into a "see everything for the time being" operation.
In addition, the shortage of human resources is also a major factor. There is a chronic shortage of SOC analysts with advanced analytical skills, and maintaining a limited number of people 24/7 is a significant burden. As a result, a negative chain of burnout, misjudgment, and turnover occurs.
Risks of SOC fatigue
SOC fatigue is not limited to "on-site hardship", but is directly related to the security risk of the entire organization.
- Missing critical incidents
It can be buried in a large number of low-priority alerts, delaying initial response to signs of intrusion that should be truly addressed. - Poor quality of response
Fatigue and habituation can make the analysis superficial, and in some cases, the identification of the root cause and the prevention of recurrence are insufficient. - Individualization and black box
Increasing decisions based on the experience of veteran analysts and continuing operations without shared knowledge can make it difficult to take over and scale. - Loss of organizational trust
Continued delays and misjudgments in incident response can lead to a decrease in trust in the SOC itself, which can lead to management seeing it as a "cost center."
Countermeasures: Key points of operational design to prevent SOC fatigue
To prevent SOC fatigue, it's important to review the "operational design itself" rather than just adding tools.
1. Alert Organization and Priority Design
The first thing you should start with is taking stock of your alerts.
Visualize which tools are occurring from which alerts are occurring and with what frequency, and organize them from the following perspectives:
- Are alerts that really need attention?
- Does it overlap with other alerts?
- Is it possible to respond automatically (SOAR, etc.)?
The first step is to clearly define the severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) and intentionally reduce the number of alerts that the SOC should see manually.
2. Use Case-Based Detection Design
Rather than simple signatures or events alone, detection design based on the premise of "attack scenarios (use cases)" is effective.
For example, by assumeing a series of flows such as "initial intrusion→ privilege escalation, → lateral expansion", multiple logs can be correlated and analyzed to improve detection accuracy while reducing noise.
This mindset becomes more practical when combined with cyber threat intelligence (CTI).
Related articles:
3. Automation and Human Roles
Operations that judge everything manually are no longer realistic.
The following tasks should be actively considered for automation:
- Close known false positive alerts
- Check IP and hash reputation
- Initial response (device isolation, account disabling, etc.)
On the other hand, concentrating analysts' time on "tasks that only humans can do," such as final judgments, areas of influence, and improvement proposals, can help prevent burnout.
4. Standardization of Operational Rules and Knowledge
One of the factors that accelerate SOC fatigue is the ambiguity of judgment criteria.
Document each alert as a playbook of what to check, how to judge, and what to do next, so that no matter who responds, the quality is maintained.
This is also closely related to the increased maturity of detection, response, and improvement demonstrated by NIST CSF 2.0.
Related articles:
5. Regular Review and Tuning
SOC operations are not designed once and finished.
It's important to regularly review alert rules and priorities as attack methods and business environments change. Set up a place for monthly and quarterly reviews and continuously discuss "alerts that can be reduced" and "detections that should be added".
What it should be
The ideal image of a SOC is not an organization that responds to all alerts.
Only important signs reach the right people at the right time.
Analysts are freed from the heavy log processing and can focus on analysis and improvement.
Management can quantitatively grasp the value of SOC and use it to make investment decisions.
Only when such a virtuous cycle is created will the SOC evolve from a "tired site" to a "core that protects the organization."
Conclusion
When it comes to prioritizing alerts and implementing automation, we often hear people say, "I don't know where to start." If you want to sort out the current state of your SOC operations and take the first steps toward optimal design, consulting with an expert is the shortest route.
Colorkrew Security provides a wide range of services, from SOC operation design reviews to automation and tuning support. Please feel free to contact us first.
Related articles: